Time-resolved velocity mapping at high magnetic fields: A preclinical comparison between stack-of-stars and cartesian 4D-Flow

in: Frontiers in Physics (2022)
Nahardani, Ali; Krämer, Martin; Ebrahimi, Mahyasadat; Herrmann, Karl-Heinz; Leistikow, Simon; Reichenbach, Jürgen; Hoerr, Verena
Purpose: Prospectively-gated Cartesian 4D-flow (referred to as Cartesian-4Dflow) imaging suffers from long TE and intensified flow-related intravoxel-dephasing especially in preclinical ultra-high field MRI. The ultra-short-echo (UTE) 4D-flow technique can resolve the signal loss in higher-order blood flows; however, the long scan time of the high resolution UTE-4D-flow is considered as a disadvantage for preclinical imaging. To compensate for prolonged acquisitions, an accelerated k0-navigated golden-angle centerout stack-of-stars 4D-flow sequence (referred to as SoS-4D-flow) was implemented at 9.4T and the results were compared to conventional Cartesian-4D-flow mapping in-vitro and in-vivo. Methods: The study was conducted in three steps (A) In-vitro evaluation in a static phantom: to quantify the background velocity bias. (B) In-vitro evaluation in a flowing water phantom: to investigate the effects of polar undersampling (US) on the measured velocities and to compare the spatial velocity profiles between both sequences. (C) In-vivo evaluations: 24 C57BL/6 mice were measured by SoS-4D-flow (n = 14) and Cartesian-4D-flow (n = 10). The peak systolic velocity in the ascending aorta and the background velocity in the anterior chest wall were analyzed for both techniques and were compared to each other. Results: According to the in-vitro analysis, the background velocity bias was significantly lower in SoS-4D-flow than in Cartesian-4D-flow (p < 0.05). Polar US in SoS-4D-flow influenced neither the measured velocity values nor the spatial velocity profiles in comparison to Cartesian-4D-flow. The in-vivo analysis showed significantly higher diastolic velocities in Cartesian-4D-flow than in SoS-4D-flow (p < 0.05). A systemic background bias was observed in the Cartesian velocity maps which influenced their streamline directions and magnitudes. Conclusion: The results of our study showed that at 9.4T SoS-4D-flow provided higher accuracy in slow flow imaging than Cartesian-4D-flow, while the same measurement time could be achieved.

Third party cookies & scripts

This site uses cookies. For optimal performance, smooth social media and promotional use, it is recommended that you agree to third party cookies and scripts. This may involve sharing information about your use of the third-party social media, advertising and analytics website.
For more information, see privacy policy and imprint.
Which cookies & scripts and the associated processing of your personal data do you agree with?

You can change your preferences anytime by visiting privacy policy.